Motorcycle accident lawyer: when riders get blamed first.
Motorcycle riders are 28x more likely to die in a crash than car occupants — and 4x more likely to be injured. They’re also routinely blamed for accidents that weren’t their fault, thanks to deep-seated bias against riders. A lawyer experienced with motorcycle cases knows how to push back on that bias and prove what really happened.
Get a free case review
Types of motorcycle crashes.
Hit by car
The most common motorcycle crash. Driver “didn’t see” the bike — usually because they didn’t look.
Lane-splitting (CA legal)
Legal in California, gray in most other states. Insurance routinely tries to blame the rider.
Left-turn crashes
Driver turns left across rider’s path. One of the deadliest scenarios.
Hit and run
UM/UIM coverage is critical when the at-fault driver flees.
Road defects
Potholes, unmarked construction, debris. Government entity claims have short deadlines.
Helmet law cases
States vary. In universal-helmet states, no helmet can reduce damages but rarely bars recovery.
The anti-biker bias problem.
Studies consistently show jurors and adjusters assume motorcyclists were speeding, weaving, or otherwise reckless — even when evidence says otherwise. This bias affects every part of a motorcycle case: insurance offers come in low, fault gets shifted to the rider, and damages get reduced. A lawyer who handles motorcycle cases regularly knows how to neutralize that bias.
Specific tactics that work:
- Helmet and gear photos. Riders who were wearing full safety gear at the time of the crash get more favorable treatment. Document what you were wearing.
- Speed reconstruction. Insurers default-assume riders were speeding. Accident reconstruction experts can prove your actual speed from physical evidence.
- Driver phone records. Subpoenaed phone records often show the at-fault driver was on their phone right before “not seeing” the motorcycle.
- Visibility analysis. Even with proper gear and headlight on, drivers under-detect motorcycles. This is a documented inattentional-blindness phenomenon — not your fault.
California’s lane-splitting law
California is the only state where lane-splitting is fully legal (CVC §21658.1). Even so, when a lane-splitting crash happens, drivers and insurers frequently try to blame the rider. The actual law: lane-splitting is legal as long as it’s done “in a safe and prudent manner.” A specific speed cap was removed in 2017 but the CHP recommends staying under 10 mph above traffic. A lawyer familiar with California motorcycle law can defend a lane-splitting case effectively.
Common questions about motorcycle claims.
What’s a typical motorcycle accident settlement?
Will not wearing a helmet hurt my case?
What if the driver says they “didn’t see” me?
Can I recover if I was lane-splitting in California?
Get matched with a motorcycle accident lawyer who fights bias.
60 seconds. Free. No obligation.